THE NUMBERS

CASE STUDY

Four laundry models, one shared problem: residents still has to do the laundry.

#provenatscale#operationalResults
5 min read
Modern multifamily property exterior at dusk

OVERVIEW

The Villas at Town Lake was dealing with a familiar problem: soft occupancy and ongoing concessions. Amenities that looked updated, but didn’t change how people lived. Nothing was broken. But nothing was moving demand.

A modern multifamily rooftop terrace at dusk

A mandatory bundled laundry service at $250 PUPM repositioned the property around convenience, not infrastructure.

RESULTS

  • Occupancy stabilized in the high 90s
  • Waiting lists formed during peak leasing
  • Rent growth followed demand, not assumptions
  • Laundry rooms were converted into usable space

THIS WASN’T AN UPGRADE. IT WAS A DEMAND DECISION.

HIDDEN COSTS & FRICTION

Beyond complaints, laundry created daily friction and hidden cost.

THE PROBLEM

Laundry wasn’t the headline issue. But it showed up every day.

  • Machines going down
  • Resident complaints
  • Staff time getting pulled into small, recurring issues
  • Friction that created noise, not value

Everything looked like everyone else.

WHAT IT WAS REALLY COSTING

Laundry wasn’t cheap. It was just spread out.

  • ~$50 PUPM → equipment (replacement, depreciation)
  • ~$50 PUPM → maintenance, repairs, water, risk

No single line item told the full story. But together, it added up.

INSIGHT

~$100 PUPM wasn’t a new spend. It was already there. Just invisible.

A resident frustrated with an unreliable washing machine

THE SHIFT

A different way to think about laundry.

A resident looking up at city high-rises from a sunlit park

FROM MACHINES TO TIME BACK

This wasn’t just a service change. It changed how residents experienced the property. A fully bundled model replaced inconsistency with something simple:

PROGRAM

  • 7-day availability
  • 24-hour turnaround
  • Flexible scheduling
  • Built into the lease (100% adoption)

POSITIONING

  • Not “laundry.” Time back. Convenience. Consistency.

We didn’t upgrade laundry. We removed it.

FROM COST TO DEMAND

When the experience improved, demand followed.

WHAT ACTUALLY CHANGED

  • Existing: ~$100 PUPM
  • New: $250 PUPM
  • True shift: +$150 PUPM

This wasn’t starting from zero. It was a repositioning decision.

A hand annotating a rising cost chart on a tablet

DEMAND IMPACT

  • Leasing conversations became easier
  • Prospects brought it up without prompting
  • Complaints dropped
  • Renewals became less price-sensitive

The property didn’t just improve. It became easier to choose.

A couple reviewing details together on a tablet

INSIGHT

Better experience → stronger demand.

Because it shows up every week, it influences how people decide where to live.

Three glowing arrows pointing upward

FROM DEMAND TO RENT GROWTH

Once demand showed up, pricing followed.

STRONGER DEMAND TURNED INTO HIGHER RENTS AND STABLE OCCUPANCY

RENT GROWTH

+$125 to +$175 per unit/month

  • Driven by demand. Not assumption.

Rent growth followed demand, not assumptions.

OCCUPANCY SHIFT

  • Before: mid–high 80s + concessions
  • After: high 90s + waiting lists
A city skyline of residential high-rises at dusk

THE PROPERTY BECAME EASIER TO CHOOSE AND HARDER TO REPLACE.

FROM OPERATIONS TO OPPORTUNITY

Fixing operations unlocked new revenue.

OPERATIONAL IMPACT

  • Fewer maintenance issues
  • Complaints dropped
  • Staff time shifted back to leasing and retention

SPACE OPPORTUNITY

  • Old laundry rooms became income producing.
A walk-in closet with an ocean view, repurposed from a laundry room

WHY IT WORKS

High demand

Low complexity

Recurring revenue

Improves retention

INSIGHT

What used to create complaints now produces revenue.

Underutilized space became a new recurring revenue stream.

THE OWNER PERSPECTIVE

Stop competing on the basics and start creating demand through services residents actually value.

Portrait of a property owner

OWNER INSIGHT

“We realized laundry wasn’t free. When we added it up, we were already around $100 per unit. The $250 program didn’t feel like a cost anymore. It created demand. And once demand showed up, we had pricing power.” — Jakob Westervelt

WHAT OWNERS SHOULD KNOW

This works best in competitive markets where differentiation matters. Mandatory adoption is what makes the model work.

Optional models dilute both the experience and the economics. Position it as time back, not laundry. Rent growth follows demand, not the other way around.

Plan for space reuse early. That second layer of value matters.

THE RISK OF COMPETING ON BASICS

  • If you keep competing on basic upgrades, you’ll keep relying on concessions.

THE REAL DIFFERENTIATOR

  • This is one of the few amenities that changes weekly life. That’s why it changes leasing outcomes.

Related Resources

View all